GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group Meeting Minutes

Meeting Details

Meeting Date: 02/05/2025
Meeting Time: 2005–2103
Meeting Location: Microsoft Teams

Note: Not a quorum.

Attendees

Attendee Moniker
Joseph Abhayaratna JA
Nicholas Car NC
Matthew Perry MP
Arkadiusz Chadzynski AC
Timo Homburg TH

Apologies

  • None

Absent

  • Paul Cripps (PC)
  • Vladimir Alexiev (VA)

Note Takers

  • JA

Action Items From Last Meetings

Done? Item Responsible Due Date
Work out what publication of alignments in OGC Rainbow looks like NC Carried forward
Prepare presentation for JAG JA, NC

Discussion Items

Time Item Who Notes
20:05 Roll call and call for patents All
  • Roll call completed.
  • No patents declared.
20:06 Previous actions All
  • No updates from JA or NC.
  • NC to work out what publication of alignments in OGC Rainbow would look like (carried forward).
  • JA and NC to prepare a presentation for JAG (scheduled for 4 p.m. Friday).
20:12 Other updates TH
  • Work starting on the CRS ontology using Metanorma (for ISO) and AsciiDoc with co‑branding (for W3C).
  • SHACL Working Group currently active; opportunity identified to test SHACL and provide feedback/CRs to assist GeoSPARQL.
  • SHACL profiles enable specification of constraint profiles.
20:18 Issues and PRs All
  • Issue discussed: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/610 — PC to post further updates; discussion on mapping to disjoint concepts and distinction between actual space, representation, and serialisation.
  • Issue discussed: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/609 — work in progress by AC.
  • Issue discussed: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/604 — TH queried representation of matrices in GeoSPARQL; PC suggested RDF Data Cube approach and will investigate further.
  • Issue discussed: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/556 — TH asked about extrusion in other dimensions (e.g., time, colour).
  • PRs noted: outstanding changes and reviews for Geocoding Vocabulary and Including common Non‑SFA functions.
  • Discussion referenced 3D Primitives Vocabulary and alignments to IFC, CityRDF, and X3D (see Actions).
21:03 Close All MEETING ENDS

Action Items

# Item Responsible Due Date
1 Investigate working within CityRDF WG to meet requirements of 3D Primitives Vocabulary and alignments to IFC, CityRDF, and X3D AC
2 Investigate interest from OGC in extending Simple Features to include 3D and identify current chair JA
3 Follow up with Rob Atkinson on review of the 3D primitives NC