GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group Meeting Minutes

Meeting Details

Meeting Date: 01/22/2025
Meeting Time: 2004–2107
Meeting Location: Microsoft Teams

Note: Not a quorum.

Attendees

Attendee Moniker
Matthew Perry MP
Paul Cripps PC
Timo Homburg TH

Apologies

  • Joseph Abhayaratna (JA)
  • Nicholas Car (NC)

Absent

  • Vladimir Alexiev (VA)
  • Arkadiusz Chadzynski (AC)

Note Takers

  • MP

Action Items From Last Meetings

Done? Item Responsible Due Date
Work out what publication of alignments in OGC Rainbow looks like NC Carried forward
Present GeoSPARQL alignment material to JAG JA, NC Carried forward

Discussion Items

Time Item Who Notes
20:04 Roll call and call for patents All
  • Roll call completed.
  • No patents declared.
20:05 Previous actions All
  • No updates from JA or NC.
  • NC to work out what publication of alignments in Rainbow looks like.
  • JA and NC to present to JAG.
20:06 Other updates TH, PC
  • Geonovum meeting attended by TH, NC, PC, AC, Louis, and Rolf Jonker.
  • Six participants plus additional volunteers agreed to write a GeoSPARQL 3D white paper on theory and applications.
  • Group to meet fortnightly.
  • TH to email JA about setting up a repository for white paper work.
  • PC reported interesting discussions on extending RCC8 to 3D (RCC25).
  • Discussion on scope of work and possibility of a reference implementation of RCC25 for a single literal type.
  • TH noted lack of a de‑facto standard set of 3D spatial functions.
  • TH suggested identifying equivalences between Simple Features and RCC25.
  • PC noted equivalences for 2D relations are well understood.
  • Reference to paper covering RCC25, RCC29, and RCC31: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/62645857.pdf
  • TH referenced related GeoSPARQL issue: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/416
  • Additional references shared: https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/13/1/25 and https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3D-Topological-Relations-for-3D-Spatial-Analysis-Supangkat-Machbub/4879e45f30712f6966017db74daad675255226df
  • TH discussed CityOWL use of GML literals for geometry representation.
  • TH presented slides on possible representations for 3D objects in GeoSPARQL.
  • TH added 3D vocabulary and alignments to the GitHub repository.
  • Identified need for vocabularies, relations, and functions.
20:54 Issues and PRs All
  • Issue discussed: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/610 — PC to post additional updates; discussion on disjoint concepts and distinctions between actual space, representation, and serialisation.
  • Issue discussed: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/609 — work in progress by AC.
  • Issue discussed: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/604 — TH queried how to represent matrices in GeoSPARQL; PC suggested RDF Data Cube approach.
  • Issue discussed: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/556 — TH raised question about extrusion in other dimensions (e.g. time, colour).
  • PR discussed: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/536 — TH still working on wording for implementers converting output to desired CRS.
21:07 Close All MEETING ENDS

Action Items

# Item Responsible Due Date
No new action items recorded