GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group Meeting Minutes

Meeting Details

Meeting Date: 23/02/2022

Meeting Time: 2030 UTC

Meeting Location: GoToMeeting

Attendees

Attendee Moniker
Joseph Abhayaratna JA
Timo Homburg TH
Matthew Perry MP
Frans Knibbe FK
Nicholas Car NC

Note Takers

  • JA, MP

Action Items From Last Meetings

| Done? | Item | Responsible | Due Date | | —- | —- | —- | — |

Discussion Items

Time Item Who Notes
2035 Intro JA Call for Patents
  • None known
Roll Call
  • Attendees recorded in minutes
  • Attendees confirmed vocally
2037 Any business before going through PRs All
  • NC: We should mark remaining issues that need to be fixed before publishing 1.1
  • JA: How is the progress on the CRS Ontology paper
    • TH: current paper is here https://github.com/opengeospatial/ontology-crs/pull/1
    • FK: Presentation is here https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15Qh2k79wFoDCDWLuGt9CHbWuxecjfSi17QMp4zrbyWI/edit?usp=sharing
    • Presentation on March 2
    • FK and TH to present, JA to add some high level points
2048 Running through PRs All
  • [#288](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/288)
    • NC & TH: Awaiting comment from FK because it’s his issue
    • NC: I want to avoid repeating what is in the related standards
    • FK to review
  • [#287](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/287)
    • TH: We need to update a table in one of the annexes (D3)
    • NC to review

Running through issues All
  • [#199](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/199) FK: In progress, still waiting for Gobe
  • [#112](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/112) NC: Will review shortly
  • [#269](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/269)
    • FK: to be addressed with a new paragraph
    • Related to issue [#278](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/278)
    • Also [#285](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/285)
  • [#225](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/255)
    • In progress by FK and LVB
    • FK: end product will be 5 different .ttl files
    • FK: will create a separate issue for missing en tags
  • [#22](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/22)
    • NC: can we close this one
    • FK: it was MB’s issue
    • NC: I believe the decision was that it is a group attribution
    • NC: we should be able to close this pending a check with MB
  • [#110](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/110)
    • TH: we have already added a transformation function for SRS transformation in 1.1
    • NC: moving to in-progress
  • [#285](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/285) NC & MP: ok to remove ISO 19107 reference
  • [#115](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/115) NC & TH: this issue is already done
  • [#100](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/100)
    • NC: Just keep updating the list
    • FK: one list or two lists?
    • NC: we should have 2 lists: original plus 1.1 list
    • NC: waiting for input from SS
  • [#177](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/177) FK: PR 287 will close it
  • [#256](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/256)
    • NC: I will get to it
    • NC: TH and NC are doing some related testing
  • [#144](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/144)
    • NC: A recent comment addresses some of this
    • Potentially addressed by PR 288
  • [#163](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/163) NC: probably ready to work on this now
  • [#261](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/261)
    • Missing a few functions that we need to add: concaveHull, boundingCircle, convexHull
    • FK: Some inconsistent naming between functions, properties and aggregates
    • NC: Need aliases for bounding box and envelope
    • NC to make the changes
  • [#270](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/270) NC to take a look
  • [#272](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/272) FK to do it
  • [#277](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/277)
    • FK: in progress
    • NC: does the vocabulary need more notes or just spec - FK: spec should be enough
  • [#286](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/286) FK to do
  • [#238](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/238) NC waiting on Simple Features explanation from FK
2154 Other business All
  • NC: we need to make some progress on moving the 1.1 spec along
  • NC: we need a 1.2 version for ISO this calendar year
  • NC: let’s ask the chairs what is next in the process
  • FK: it would be good to tackle the DGGS issues first
2200     MEETING ENDS

Action Items

| # | Item | Responsible | Due Date | | —- | —- | —- | —- |