GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group Meeting Minutes
Meeting Details
Meeting Date: 26/01/2022
Meeting Time: 2030 UTC
Meeting Location: GoToMeeting
Attendees
Attendee |
Moniker |
Joseph Abhayaratna |
JA |
Timo Homburg |
TH |
Matthew Perry |
MP |
Frans Knibbe |
FK |
Linda van den Brink |
LV |
Nicholas Car |
NC |
Note Takers
Action Items From Last Meetings
| Done? | Item | Responsible | Due Date |
| —- | —- | —- | — |
Discussion Items
Time |
Item |
Who |
Notes |
2037 |
Intro |
JA |
Call for PatentsRoll Call- Attendees recorded in minutes
- Attendees confirmed vocally
|
2040 |
Questions with OGC |
JA |
- Release Notes template: https://github.com/opengeospatial/templates/tree/master/release_notes_template
- Issue [#199](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/199): seems from the thread that this one is in work. Given that GML is one of the Standards, resolvable URIs could take quite a while!
- Units of Measure: OGC does not have an “official” reference, but older Standards used UCUM and now most informatively reference QUDT. Given that GeoSPARQL requires a proper, semantic-web-friendly dependency, I think that it would be just fine to limit the reference to QUDT. I can foresee cases where a completely novel set of units could be created and required, so limiting to QUDT may not be ideal.
|
2045 |
Run through Pull Requests and Issues |
All |
- |
2210 |
Other business |
All |
- Features and Geometries [#26](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-feat-geo-json/issues/26) . This relates to version 1.2.
- GeoSPARQL 1.1 Paper was accapted, should be published shortly
- Closing off DGGS discussion in the next fortnight
|
2214 |
|
|
MEETING ENDS |
Action Items
| # | Item | Responsible | Due Date |
| —- | —- | —- | —- |