GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group Meeting Minutes

Meeting Details

Meeting Date: 05/05/2021

Meeting Time: 2030 UTC

Meeting Location: GoToMeeting

Attendees

Attendee Moniker
Joseph Abhayaratna JA
Timo Homburg TH
Frans Knibbe FK
Matthew Perry MP
Nicholas Car NC
Simon Cox SC

Note Takers

  • JA

Action Items From Last Meetings

| Done? | Item | Responsible | Due Date | | —- | —- | —- | — |

Discussion Items

Time Item Who Notes
2040 Intro JA Call for Patents
  • None known
Roll Call
  • Attendees recorded in minutes
  • Attendees confirmed vocally
2042 Run through of open issues All Issue: Missing license #60<ul><li>Tasks created for Nick and Jo, in the ticket
Issue: What is hasSpatialResolution range #98</li><li>Work on this ticket is Done, awaiting PR review #122
Issue: Include all functions already described in Simple Features for SQL #11 <ul><li>Assigned to JA to add to Annex C (make generic, and add table)</li><li>Work complete, awaiting PR review</li></ul>Issue: Additional GeoSPARQL requirements from Loc-I project #33 <ul><li> Work outlined in the ticket is done, but there is outstanding work added during the commentary of the ticket that needs to be captured in a new issue (DONE)</li><li> Let’s get approval from the requestor to close this issue (Simon Cox)</li></ul>Issue: Add a list of 1.1 New Features to the Revision history section #114 <ul><li>Work complete, awaiting PR review</li></ul> Issue: Fix figure annotations in 8.18.1. B.1 Example Data #90 <ul><li>Work complete, awaiting PR review</li></ul>Issue: Add examples of all New Features to Annex B #121
Issue: Update the CHANGELOG in the spec #95 <ul><li>Work complete, awaiting PR review</li></ul>Issue: RDF examples #122<ul><li> Discussed, particularly the inSRS property, and implications caused for DGGS</li><li>Resolution looks to be defining DGGS literals more specifically</li></ul> Issue: Add concepts for accuracies and tolerances and What is hasSpatialResolution range #98 <ul><li>Resolution/accuracy metrics issue has also come up in DCAT revision - see #1266 and #15 The DQV vocabulary is very flexible, but also rather abstract</li></ul>Issue: Which conventions to use for ontology annotation and metadata? #63
Closed completed issues
2140     MEETING ENDS

Action Items

| # | Item | Responsible | Due Date | | —- | —- | —- | —- |