GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group Meeting Minutes
Meeting Details
Meeting Date: 10/02/2021
Meeting Time: 2030 UTC
Meeting Location: GoToMeeting
Attendees
| Attendee | Moniker | 
|---|---|
| Joseph Abhayaratna | JA | 
| Krzysztof Janowicz | KJ | 
| Mathias Bonduel | MB | 
| Matthew Perry | MP | 
| Nicholas Car | NC | 
| Paul Cripps | PC | 
| Peter Vretanos | PV | 
| Robert Gibb | RG | 
| Simon Cox | SC | 
| Timo Homburg | TH | 
Note Takers
- JA
 
Action Items From Last Meetings
| Done? | Item | Responsible | Due Date | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Y | Remove redundancy in labels and comments, replace DC with DC terms, and moving attributions up to the ontology level | NC | Next Meeting | 
| Y | Contact Scott Simmons to work out how attribution should work in the ontology. Examples: OGC Standards (listing editors) and DCAT (https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat2.ttl) | JA | Next Meeting | 
| Y | Send the commands for using asciidoctor to create the ontology in PDF and HTML | JA | Next Meeting | 
| Y | Add KJ (kjano) as a review for https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/72 | JA | Done in Meeting | 
| Y | Use safunctions in the path segment on https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/57 | TH | Next Meeting | 
| N | Finalise work on https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/52 and submit for review | NC | Next Meeting | 
| Y | Send through some names. From KJ: Timo, Blake Regalia could come to mind, Carsten Kessler, Tomi Kauppinen, maybe Simon Scheider | KJ | Done in Meeting | 
Discussion Items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 2030 | Intro | JA | Call for Patents  - None known Roll Call - Attendees recorded in minutes  | 
    
| 2037 | Changing CI Default Branch | TH | - CI creates a copy of the source files in the gh-pages branch, and compiles the outputs there. We’d like to link to the index page generated from the README.md in master so that people can see the published working  - Decision: We’ll keep working on master, enable GitHub Pages, and link to the index.html from that in the README.md (Action 1)  | 
    
| 2048 | Pull Requests | All | - Reviewers for https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/79 on deck (Action 2)  - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/52 (Actions 3, 4, 5, and 6)  | 
    
| 2111 | OGC API Features Search | PV | Raising awareness of the following proposal for search in the OGC API Features SWG. https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-features/tree/master/proposals/search (Actions 7 and 8) | 
| 2114 | GeoSPARQL to CQL Mapping | TH | https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/44 raised to create the mapping. https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/68 implements it, needs a reviewer (Action 9) | 
| 2118 | Contacting Vendors | NC | Issue https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/59 needs some love (Actions 10 and 11) | 
| 2125 | GeoSPARQL Benchmark | TH | GeoSPARQL Benchmark to presented here: http://www.lotico.com/index.php/Semantic_GeoSpatial_Web_-_Use_Cases_Workshop (Action 12) | 
| 2128 | DGGSLiteral implementations | NC | PR for DGGS Literal is being implemented as extensions for Jena/Fuseki and GraphDB | 
| 2130 | Conformance Classes | MB | Need conformance classes (Action 13) | 
| 2139 | MEETING ENDS | 
Action Items
| # | Item | Responsible | Due Date | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Link to the gh-pages index.html from master README.md (https://opengeospatial.github.io/ogc-geosparql/) | JA | Next Meeting | 
| 2 | Review https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/79 | SC | Next Meeting | 
| 3 | Add relevant members from other SWGs as reviews for https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/52 | PV | Next Meeting | 
| 4 | Add RG to Github members | JA | Next Meeting | 
| 5 | Add reviewers for https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/52 | NC | Next Meeting | 
| 6 | Finalise work on https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/52 and submit for review | NC | Next Meeting | 
| 7 | Review the OGC API Features search proposal | NC, TH | Next Meeting | 
| 8 | Demo the features API using geosparql examples | NC | Next Meeting | 
| 9 | Review GeoSPARQL to CQL Mapping | PV | Next Meeting | 
| 10 | Update the Vendor list in https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/59. There’s a few vendors the list of compliant vendors that haven’t been contacted yet | NC | Next Meeting | 
| 11 | Create a template email for contacting vendors to confirm contacts and let them know what’s happening in the SWG | NC | Next Meeting | 
| 12 | Organise a presentation of the GeoSPARQL Benchmark at Geosemantics DWG | JA | Next Meeting | 
| 13 | Work up a set of conformance classes for v1.1, with MP as one of the reviewers | NC | Next Meeting |