GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group Meeting Minutes
Meeting Details
Meeting Date: 27/01/2021
Meeting Time: 2030 UTC
Meeting Location: GoToMeeting
Attendees
| Attendee | Moniker |
|---|---|
| Gabriella Wiersma | GW |
| Joseph Abhayaratna | JA |
| Krzysztof Janowicz | KJ |
| Matthew Perry | MP |
| Nicholas Car | NC |
| Timo Homburg | TH |
Note Takers
- JA
Action Items From Last Meetings
| Done? | Item | Responsible | Due Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Y | Send email to W3C Spatial Data on the Web Working Group mailing list to inform them of the revision of GeoSPARQL | JA | Next Meeting |
| Y | copy all correct GoToMeeting URLs into meeting requests | JA | 14/01/2021 |
Discussion Items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2030 | Intro | JA | Call for Patents - None known Roll Call - Attendees recorded in minutes |
| 2037 | Attribution in Ontologies | KJ | - Seems like every predicate is attributed, which seems like overkill and potentially causes issues with people racing to commit - Discussion in group: let’s use a rolled up whole of standard attribution and leave it at that. This mimics the paper based standards, and other standard standards practice. (Actions 1 and 2) |
| 2048 | Pull Requests | All | - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/78 adds a continuous integration process that validates our TTL files, and provides a landing page for them using pyLODE. We would preferably use asciidoctor to create the ontology. (Action 3) - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/72 (Action 4) - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/57 (Action 5) - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/52 (Action 6) |
| 2122 | Issues | All | - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/12: TH has put together https://github.com/situx/proj4rdf for a related project, and recommended it in the issue. - Question about geof:buffer (and other functions with ogc:geomLiteral, … -> ogc:geomLiteral). Expectation from users in that output subclass will match input subclass for geomLiteral. Not expected to test other subclasses, but the standard doesn’t currently make a change in geomLiteral subclass non-compliant. - Can we get a list of reviews to TH for the GeoSPARQL Benchmark. (Action 7) |
| 2139 | MEETING ENDS |
Action Items
| # | Item | Responsible | Due Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Remove redundancy in labels and comments, replace DC with DC terms, and moving attributions up to the ontology level | NC | Next Meeting |
| 2 | Contact Scott Simmons to work out how attribution should work in the ontology. Examples: OGC Standards (listing editors) and DCAT (https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/dcat2.ttl) | JA | Next Meeting |
| 3 | Send the commands for using asciidoctor to create the ontology in PDF and HTML | JA | Next Meeting |
| 4 | Add KJ (kjano) as a review for https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/72 | JA | Done in Meeting |
| 5 | Use safunctions in the path segment on https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/57 | TH | Next Meeting |
| 6 | Finalise work on https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/pull/52 and submit for review | NC | Next Meeting |
| 7 | Send through some names. From KJ: Timo, Blake Regalia could come to mind, Carsten Kessler, Tomi Kauppinen, maybe Simon Scheider | KJ | Done in Meeting |